Unanswered questions

RED ELEPHANT WRITES:

The persistent theft of copper cables from Telecom Namibia has become a matter of growing national concern. 

Beyond the significant financial losses, these incidents disrupt communications, affect businesses and households, and compromise critical national infrastructure. 

The increasing frequency of these thefts raises important questions that deserve clear answers from the relevant authorities.

SURVEILLANCE: The latest reported theft in Khomasdal, on Friday, occurred near the Magdalena Stoffels Bridge. It is understood that surveillance cameras are installed on the bridge and at some nearby properties. Have investigators obtained and analysed the available footage to identify possible suspects?

NATIONAL PATTERN: Similar copper cable thefts have been reported across Namibia. Have law enforcement agencies established whether these incidents are linked, or whether organised criminal networks may be involved?

TECHNOLOGY: If Telecom Namibia, MTC Namibia and Paratus Namibia rely on comparable telecommunications infrastructure, why do Telecom Namibia’s copper cables appear to be disproportionately targeted?

PREVENTATIVE MEASURES: Has Telecom Namibia considered expanding surveillance at known hotspots, including around manholes and vulnerable cable routes, to deter theft and improve the chances of identifying offenders?

BUYERS AND SCRAP DEALERS: Have arrested suspects been questioned about the buyers of stolen copper? Have scrap metal dealers been monitored or investigated to determine whether stolen telecommunications infrastructure is entering the legitimate recycling market?

EXPERTISE: Does stealing these cables require specialised technical knowledge and equipment, or can such crimes realistically be committed by opportunistic individuals acting alone?

POSSIBLE SABOTAGE: Given the repeated disruption to telecommunications services, have investigators considered whether any incidents may involve deliberate sabotage aimed at damaging critical infrastructure, rather than theft motivated solely by the value of the copper?

LEADERSHIP: Prior to his resignation, social media carried repeated allegations questioning the competence of Telecom Namibia’s Managing Director, Stanley Shanapinda. After it became known that he had accepted a new appointment elsewhere, those allegations largely subsided. Was this merely coincidental, or have the origins and motives behind those online campaigns ever been examined?

SECURITY: Why does access to certain sections of Telecom Namibia’s underground cable network appear to remain relatively easy? Are existing physical security measures adequate, or should they be strengthened?

VALUE: How many kilometres of copper cable have been stolen over the past five years, and what is the estimated total financial value of these losses?

ARRESTS: How many people have been arrested, prosecuted and convicted in connection with copper cable theft during this period?

RESTORATION: On average, how long does it take to restore telecommunications services after a copper cable theft incident?

IMPACT: What is the estimated economic impact of these service disruptions on businesses, schools, hospitals, government institutions and households?

INFRASTRUCTURE: Why has the replacement of copper cables with fibre-optic infrastructure, where technically and financially feasible, not been accelerated?

COLLABORATION: Is there sufficient cooperation between Telecom Namibia, the Namibian Police Force and the scrap metal industry to combat this form of crime effectively?

MARKET: Is there any evidence that stolen copper is being smuggled across Namibia's borders, or is it primarily being sold within the country?

LEGISLATION: Has the government considered introducing stricter legislation and tighter regulation governing the purchase and sale of scrap metal to reduce the market for stolen copper?

JUSTICE: Are the current penalties for copper cable theft severe enough to deter offenders, given the widespread disruption these crimes cause to critical national infrastructure?

ASSESSMENT: Has an independent assessment been conducted to determine whether additional technologies – such as smart sensors, underground alarm systems, drones or artificial intelligence-assisted surveillance – could help protect vulnerable sections of the telecommunications network?

The public has a legitimate interest in understanding how critical national infrastructure is being protected. Transparent answers and decisive action would not only strengthen public confidence but could also contribute to more effective prevention of future incidents.

* Beste lesers, keuring vir die ­publikasie van WhatsApp, briewe en alle ander lesers­bydraes berus by Republikein. Klagtes oor die diens van ­private besighede word eers aan die onder­neming vir reaksie voorgelê. Die menings van ons lesers en rubriekskrywers verteenwoordig nie noodwendig die standpunt van Republikein nie. Republikein is ’n lid van die Redakteursforum van Namibië (EFN) en onderskryf die etiese kode vir die Namibiese media soos toegepas deur die media-ombudsman.